Review Grant Application

Welcome Name Here

Thank-you for participating in our 2024 Grant Application review. Below you will see a table that lists the proposals that have been assigned for you to review.

In the table there are two columns with links named "View Proposal" and "Review Form". Clicking on "View Proposal" will load a specific proposal to review within this page.

Clicking on "Grant Review Form" will load a separate form in a new tab/window. We recommend opening the review form in a new window so you can easily jump between the proposal you are reviewing and the separate review form.

Each criteria is given a score (1-10) which is then automatically multiplied by the weighting formula in the Grant Review Form. Please make all ratings out of 10. They are weighted differently but all ratings are out of 10

Criteria for Assesment of Proposals Score to be Awarded
Alignment with CFDR

Is the proposal within the interests and objectives of CFDR?

Will the proposal add significantly to the state of knowledge on the subject with direct application to the practice of dietetics/ nutrition?

Rate 1-10 (Unsatisfactory to Outstanding)
Achievability

Are the objectives of the project achievable and, if the objectives are stated in the form of a hypothesis, is the time reference reasonable with respect to the realization of the testing of this hypothesis?

If the project is part of a larger project, can the specific project/part be reported on within the time allowed?

Rate 1-10 (Unsatisfactory to Outstanding)
Present Knowledge

Is the investigator aware of the present state of knowledge in the area to be investigated? The application must include evidence of a comprehensive literature review.

Rate 1-10 (Unsatisfactory to Outstanding)
Methodology

Is the methodology of the proposal sound? The application must include details of the methodology to be used.

Are there alternative ways to undertake this proposal?

Are the methods of data collection and analysis sound?

Is the sample size appropriate to achieve the objectives?

Rate 1-10 (Unsatisfactory to Outstanding)
Expertise & Infastructure

Does the research team have the expertise necessary to complete this research?

Is there sufficient infrastructure and support to enable the success of this research project?

Rate 1-10 (Unsatisfactory to Outstanding)
Significance to dietetics

Is the budget reasonable and adequate in relation to the objectives of the study?

Has the applicant identified other sources of income for the project, if any?

Has the applicant identified sources of continued funding if required at the completion of the project?

Rate 1-10 (Unsatisfactory to Outstanding)

 

Go back
Entry ID
740
Full Proposal: Single Document Upload
Title of Project:
Total Funds Requested:
Combined Score (NEW - Proposal Version)
CFDR Decision
Name
M M
Credentials
MMM
Canadian Dietetics Regulatory Body #
123456
DC Member #
987653
Professional Title
MM
Email
m@mmmmmmm.ca
Phone
(555) 555-5555
Address
M STREET BARRIE, ON L4N 7V2
Name
Role
Email
Canadian Dietetics Regulatory Body #
DC Member #
Professional Title
Credentials
Phone
Address
Name
Role
Can. Dietetics Regulatory Body #
DC Member #
Professional Title
Credentials
Name
Role
Can. Dietetics Regulatory Body #
DC Member #
Professional Title
Credentials
Name
Role
Can. Dietetics Regulatory Body #
Professional Title
Credentials
DC Member #
Name
Role
Can. Dietetics Regulatory Body #
Professional Title
Credentials
DC Member #
Name of Sponsoring Institution
M
Institutions Charitable Registration #
51525316345345345
Name
M M
Official Title
MM
Mailing Address
MMM ST. LONDON, ON N5V 4E5
Email
m@mmmmmmmmm.com
Phone
+17057919597
Does this project include Human participants?
Yes
Is the approval included or is it pending?
Included
If the project is funded, when will it begin?
11/30/2023
Intended duration of project?
1 Year
Where will the project be carried out?
LONDON ON
Is there participation of other institutions agencies?
Yes
Have you previously received funding from CFDR?
Yes
If yes, list title of project(s) and year(s) of award(s):
SDFGSDGSDFGSDFGSDFG
If no, provide explanation:
Have the final reports been submitted to CFDR?
N/A
List up to 5 Grants held by the Principal Investigator(s) and members of the team in the last 5 years:
SDFGSDFG
List 3 Suggestions for External Reviewers
SDGFSDFGSGDS
Name
M M
Signature
Name
Signature
Name
M M
Signature
Name
Signature
Name
M M
Title
MM
Email
mmmmm@mmmmmmmm.com
Signature
Entry Log

WPForms Views Entry edited.

Entry read.

Entry Status
Completed
Print Entry Button

Completed Reviews

We Can’t Do This Without You.

Donate today or contact us.