Manage Abstracts
View, approve, edit, or delete Abstracts using the table below.
Entry ID
320
Entry Date
September 18, 2022 9:24 pm
Reference Id
ZdfBiA2TtWKoPkpJ
Approve Entries
CFDR Reviewer
Document Status
Published
Click to Edit
Name
Email
Language
English
Year
2017
Category
Presentation Preference
Title
Opening the book on nutrition literacy: A critical investigation into Canadian dietitians’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices
Names, Organizational Affiliations, and Locations of all Authors
Introduction/Purpose
Objective(s)/Process or Summary of Content
This study describes registered dietitians’ (RDs) knowledge, practices, and
attitudes (KPAs), barriers, and preferred learning methods with regard to functional (FNL),
interactive (INL), and critical (CNL) nutrition literacy.
attitudes (KPAs), barriers, and preferred learning methods with regard to functional (FNL),
interactive (INL), and critical (CNL) nutrition literacy.
Method(s)/Systemic Approach Used
An invitation to an online survey was distributed to Canadian RDs by four
provincial dietetic registration bodies, three working groups, and Dietitians of Canada.
Items included demographics, (dis)agreement statements about nutrition literacy KPAs,
barriers, and preferred learning methods. To assess differences in demographics by KPAs,
barriers, and preferred learning methods, independent samples t-tests and chi-square
analyses were used. All statistical tests were two-sided with significance set at p<0.05.
provincial dietetic registration bodies, three working groups, and Dietitians of Canada.
Items included demographics, (dis)agreement statements about nutrition literacy KPAs,
barriers, and preferred learning methods. To assess differences in demographics by KPAs,
barriers, and preferred learning methods, independent samples t-tests and chi-square
analyses were used. All statistical tests were two-sided with significance set at p<0.05.
Results/Conclusions
Of the 437 survey respondents, over 80% believe that FNL, INL, and CNL are important to promote nutrition-related behaviours in Canada. Only 47%, 66%, and 20% implement FNL, INL, and CNL in their practice, respectively. Those most likely to teach INL and CNL include: RDs over 40 years of age (p<0.01), community-based RDs (p<0.05), and RDs whose work involves at least 50% nutrition education (p<0.01). The most common barriers identified by respondents were (1) a lack of credibly trained nutrition professionals to teach nutrition literacy (54%); (2) a lack of access to education resources (53%); and (3) a lack of interest from clients (51%). Over 90% of respondents indicated that they would prefer learning how to teach nutrition literacy through professional practice guidelines, webinars, and online tutorials.
Conclusions(s)/Recommendations
RDs in Canada realize the importance of nutrition literacy and feel responsible for promoting it, yet few do beyond the Functional level. By promoting and enhancing client nutrition literacy at higher levels, RDs could do much to improve the nutritional health of Canadians.
Significance to Dietetics
These results present the training needs and barriers with regard to teaching nutrition literacy and may support the development of training resources for RDs and their advocacy for nutrition literacy in general.
Funded by
Original Work
Transfer of Copyright
Co-Authors Review and Notification
Newsletter
Delete Entry Link
