Late Breaking (Admin)

View abstracts and assign reviewers to review submitted abstracts.

Submitted Abstracts

Entry IDScoreDecisionPresentationSubtypeEntry DateYearView AbstractCategoryCFDR ReviewersTitleNameLanguageEmail
610
62
-
-
Late Breaking
2023
Research
Christina Nash,Louise St-Denis
Do support factors for implementing voluntary nutrition guidelines affect the healthfulness of recreation facility food environments? A Qualitative Comparative Analysis across three Canadian provinces
Susan Caswell
English
sue.caswell@uwaterloo.ca
609
63
-
-
Late Breaking
2023
Research
Lesley Andrade,Louise St-Denis
What dietitians need to know about salivary biomarkers as an assessment of growth of healthy children: A scoping review
Emily Johnston
English
emj550@usask.ca
607
63
-
-
Late Breaking
2023
Research
Billie Jane Hermosura,Louise St-Denis
Feasibility of a Home Hemodialysis Bike Loan Project
Lysa Wone
English
lysa.wone@fraserhealth.ca
606
62
-
-
Late Breaking
2023
Research
Christina Lengyel,Louise St-Denis
Evaluation of school lunch programs
Roseann Nasser
English
roseann.nasser@saskhealthauthority.ca
605
52
-
-
Late Breaking
2023
Research
Lesley Andrade,Louise St-Denis
Falls in hospital and malnutrition
Roseann Nasser
English
roseann.nasser@saskhealthauthority.ca
604
49
-
-
Late Breaking
2023
Research
Carla D'Andreamatteo,Lesley Andrade
Perceptions of the Current Food Service Delivery Model at Jim Pattison Children’s Hospital (Part I: Prior to Room Service Implementation)
Ester Kang
English
ester.kang@saskhealthauthority.ca
603
57
-
-
Late Breaking
2023
Research
Carla D'Andreamatteo,Lesley Andrade
Healthy Lifestyle Programs for Children with High BMI in Canada
Martina Richmond
English
martina.richmond@saskhealthauthority.ca
602
60
-
-
Late Breaking
2023
Experience Sharing
Carla D'Andreamatteo,Lesley Andrade
Advancing clinical skills: evaluating a program for new graduate dietitians
Erin Brown
English
erin.brown@fraserhealth.ca
601
51
-
-
Late Breaking
2023
Research
Carla D'Andreamatteo,Lesley Andrade
Variability in Weight and Protein Content of Individual Seeds of Eight Field Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Cultivars Grown in Two Locations in Saskatchewan
Roseann Nasser
English
roseann.nasser@saskhealthauthority.ca
600
60
-
-
Late Breaking
2023
Research
Christina Nash,Laura Forbes
Acute Pancreatitis Nutrition Care Practices on ACUs at Pasqua Hospital – Pre and Post-Survey
Roseann Nasser
English
roseann.nasser@saskhealthauthority.ca
598
55
-
-
Late Breaking
2023
Research
Christina Nash,Laura Forbes
Factors Associated with Comfort/Confidence when Having End-of-Life Conversations with Substitute Decision Makers in Long-Term Care
Lisa-Marie Back
English
healthyeating@hotmail.ca
596
64
-
-
Late Breaking
2023
Research
Christina Nash,Laura Forbes
Evaluating consumption of items that meet Health Canada’s proposed front-of-label warning among a nationally-representative sample of Canadian adults
Adelia Jacobs
English
adelia.jacobs@ubc.ca
595
59
-
-
Late Breaking
2023
Experience Sharing
Christina Nash,Laura Forbes
Tackling Malnutrition at Vancouver Coastal Health: Implementation of Subjective Global Assessment (SGA)
Eileen Cabrera
English
eileen.cabrera@vch.ca
594
69
-
-
Late Breaking
2023
Research
Christina Nash,Laura Forbes
Characteristics of older adults with malnutrition risk at hospital discharge then readmission within 90 days
Alycia Donovan
English
alydonovan@nosm.ca
593
63
-
-
Late Breaking
2023
Research
Billie Jane Hermosura,Christina Lengyel
A realist evaluation of FEHNCY Community Engagement and Mobilization for knowledge translation: the role of traditional foods in supporting cultural safety in health and nutrition research
Jolian Wong
English
jolian.wong@mail.mcgill.ca
592
60
-
-
Late Breaking
2023
Research
Billie Jane Hermosura,Christina Lengyel
A phenomenological study on a First Nation community’s experiences of resilience and food access during the pandemic.
Revathi Sahajpal
English
revathi.sahajpal@mail.mcgill.ca
590
61
-
-
Late Breaking
2023
Research
Billie Jane Hermosura,Christina Lengyel
The Provision of Probiotic-containing Foods and Fermented Foods with Patient Meals
Martina Richmond
English
martina.richmond@saskhealthauthority.ca
549
67
-
-
Late Breaking
2023
Research
Billie Jane Hermosura,Christina Lengyel
Dietitian’s Approach to Managing Enteral Nutrition Intolerance When a Formula Change is Indicated: A Canadian Clinical Practice Survey
Cindy Steel
English
cindy.steel@ca.nestle.com
542
57
-
-
Late Breaking
2023
Research
Billie Jane Hermosura,Carla D'Andreamatteo
The Evolution of Food Literacy: From Functional to Critical Conversations
Barbara Inglis
English
barbara.inglis@dfc-plc.ca
Displaying 1 - 19 of 19

Review Results

Entry ID:Total Score (Score 7-35)View ReviewCFDR ReviewerRecommendationIntroduction (Score 1-5)Objective(s) (Score 1-5)Method(s) (Score 1-5)Results (Score 1-5)Conclusions (Score 1-5)Significance to Dietetics (Score 1-5)Overall Impression (Score 1-5)Comments & Feedback
610
29
Christina Nash
Poster
5
5
3
4
4
4
4
Overall an interesting study. Suggest tightening up the methodology section, as it was at times difficult to follow/understand the process due to the many variables. Review the second sentence in Methods section - may be missing a linking word (ie. assessed by rating)? In Results section suggest putting brackets around ratings (ie. mobilization (4), context (3) and policy (3)...). Again, there are many variables and it may help the reader comprehend the findings more easily.
610
33
Louise St-Denis
Poster
5
5
5
4
5
5
4
Why is there 2 configurations necessary to see reductions in concession %DNS products?
609
27.5
Lesley Andrade
Poster
5
4
3.5
4
3
3
5
Well-written abstract.
609
35
Louise St-Denis
Poster
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
Really interesting and well done project!
607
31
Billie Jane Hermosura
Poster
4
4
4
5
5
5
4
Fascinating initiative and important for dietetic practice by promoting a wholistic approach to improving patient health.
Introduction: First two sentences somewhat superfluous and could have a stronger connection to individuals who are dialysis dependent. This is interesting: "Increasingly across Canada, intradialytic exercise is used to increase physical activity and mitigate dialysis related symptoms such as restless legs, cramping and potentially improve mood."
Objective(s) and Method(s): Appears that this was a program evaluation. Perhaps clarification is needed in the objectives so that there is stronger alignment with Method(s). If this was indeed an evaluation, then clarify it if was formative, summative, etc.
Recommendation: accept with minor revisions.
607
32
Louise St-Denis
Poster
5
5
4
5
5
4
4
When did the project took place exactly ?
606
30
Christina Lengyel
Poster
5
5
4
4
4
4
4
Good abstract. Preliminary data provided.
606
32
Louise St-Denis
Poster
5
5
4
4
5
5
4
It is not clear if the results presented reflect the perception of both parents and caregivers (sentences 2 and 3 in the results section)
605
21.5
Lesley Andrade
Poster
3
3
3.5
3
3
3
3
At times, it was difficult to follow the abstract. Some sentences were incomplete or missing important context. Overall, a stronger justification for the issue could have been made. I am not sure of the purpose of many of the variables examined since the focus was only on malnutrition; greater explanation for the reader/audience would be helpful in the conclusion and significance section.
605
30
Louise St-Denis
Poster
5
4
4
4
4
5
4
Please, specifiy the statistical analysis you performed.
Is the average intake correspond to the percentage of food served, consummed by the participants or is it the percentage of their energy requirements that is covered?
When you say "the diagnosis", is it the reason for the fall or the reason of admission ?
The study is aimed to evaluate the relationship between fall, intake and nutritional status. The results failed to present any relationship from my point of view.
604
20
Carla D'Andreamatteo
Rejected
5
3
2
3
3
2
2
The dates of the project and duration give the sense this was a last minute endeavour. I know we should not reject but I do not quite understand how this one qualifies as being useful research, even within the facility it was conducted. It feels like a first step to something but I will need the second reviewer to lend some insight to perhaps how this one could be considered a good item to have as a poster.
604
29
Lesley Andrade
Poster
4.5
5
4
4
3.5
4
4
This is a well-written abstract. The results section was strong, except for the last sentence re: LoS; this was hard to follow and could be written more clearly. In the conclusion, I am not sure the last sentence can be drawn from this study.
603
31
Carla D'Andreamatteo
Poster
5
5
4
4
4
5
4
A really important topic at this time. Great concept to investigate and I really like the approach to look for best-practice and scan the literature to see how best to move forward with something that is likely going to be needed soon.
603
26
Lesley Andrade
Poster
4
4
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
4
Overall, a good abstract. At times, repetitive, e.g., methods are a repeat of the objectives, and much of the conclusion was restating the results. For methods, additional details on how the reviews and scans were completed would add value to the abstract. For conclusions, extending the findings to the context would have been interesting, e.g., the scan was Canada-wide, were any of the programs available in Saskatoon?
602
28
Carla D'Andreamatteo
Poster
5
5
4
3
3
4
4
A few items: In methods, need to state it was 18-month period (missing month). There are statistics provided for the post-learning onboarding however not for the "respondents agreed" the on-boarding met needs, please include a numerical value to support this response. If any qualitative responses provided on the feedback survey, that could lend depth to the results as well.
602
31.5
Lesley Andrade
Poster
5
5
4.5
3.5
4
5
4.5
This is a well-written abstract. One minor point of clarification, in the 'Systemic Approach Used' section, the timeframe unit is missing, i.e., the 18-month period. For the results section, it would have been nice to see results re: the mentorship meetings. Were these evaluated? How many were offered? Did trainees appreciate them?
601
26
Carla D'Andreamatteo
Poster
4
5
3
3
3
4
4
It seems there should be more detail about the 2 different growing locations as the growing environment is identified as an influencer on protein content. Additionally, were the results at each site similar to each other or is there significant variability within one site location too? I might have missed that is what is being listed as the results or it wasn't clear to me. That seems an important detail to clarify. The project has some valuable information I just think there needs to be more of these included in the write up.
601
25
Lesley Andrade
Poster
3
4
4
4
3.5
3
3.5
This was an interesting abstract. For those not familiar with the area, I think more background could be provided in the introduction to describe the issue and the importance of the research. The methods were well-written, and the results section followed up with relevant details. The author could have elaborated more in the 'significance to dietetics' section.
600
29
Laura Forbes
Poster
5
5
1
4
5
5
4
The methods section needs more detail. I would like to know who you recruited. Some brief information about the types of questions asked on the survey would be beneficial. I'd also like to know what the main learning outcomes of the education session was. I was a bit confused in the results section about the confidence rating in managing acute pancreatitis. How did this relate to nutrition?
600
31
Christina Nash
Poster
5
5
3
5
4
5
4
Good job! Suggest expanding methodology to explain the survey in more detail (ie. type of survey, # of questions). Great layout of results: succinct and well-summarized. Suggest strengthening conclusions to give clarity (ie. Providing nutrition education on....changed hospitalists perceptions...). Consider changing the word "confirm" to "suggest".
598
24
Laura Forbes
Poster
5
4
4
2
4
3
4
In your objectives, it wasn't clear that your participants were going to be mostly dietitians. Perhaps some more specificity about the types of HCPs you were recruiting would be appropriate. What was your sample size? I probably wouldn't say this: "While it was not possible to conclusively determine factors associated with comfort/confidence of health care providers due to the sample size of various factors". No study is ever conclusive, so I don't think this is important. For your significant results and close-to-significant results, you didn't specify the direction of the relationship or in the case of provinces, which provinces had more/less comfort with talking about EOL. I am assuming that having policies and having team conversations made people more comfortable, but you should specify.
598
31
Christina Nash
Poster
5
5
4
4
5
4
4
Interesting study on a topic most HCP struggle with. Suggest moving descriptive stat findings (gender/age) to results section.
596
34
Laura Forbes
Poster
5
5
5
4
6
5
4
In the results, rather than "The median amount of energy " it should be "The percent of total energy". The same is true in the second sentence of the results. You're talking about the % of fat, sugar, sodium intake coming from these foods. There are a few grammatical errors. Another round of proofreading would help.
596
30
Christina Nash
Poster
5
4
5
5
4
3
4
Objectives: suggest tightening up wording to improve clarity. Possibly split into 2 sentences or provide separation between the 2 measurables being used. In the results section, suggest separating the 2004/2015 data. Significance to Dietetics: suggest highlighting why these findings are important to dietitians/significant for our field, as current statement is more reflective of study conclusions.
595
29
Laura Forbes
Poster
2
5
3
4
5
5
5
What did the pre-post surveys assess? I'd like to see a bit about that in the methods. I would also like a statement about who you were recruiting in the methods section. In the results section, it wasn't clear to me if the survey results were coming from the trainers, the trainees or both. Could you specify?
595
30
Christina Nash
Poster
4
4
3
5
5
5
4
Purpose: Suggest adding malnutrition into the purpose statement. Methods: expand upon the process, survey used (if applicable) and chart audit. (ie. was there a timeline for conducting chart review?). Results: excellent summary.
594
34
Christina Nash
Poster
5
5
5
5
4
5
5
Despite limited conclusions/generalizability, well done.
594
35
Laura Forbes
Poster
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
A very clear abstract. Great job!
593
30
Christina Lengyel
Poster
5
5
4
4
4
4
4
Important project. Methods and results need further development. Good abstract.
593
33
Billie Jane Hermosura
Poster
5
4
4
5
5
5
5
Novel topic and approach. Much needed work to inform practice.
Objective(s): unclear whether the abstract reflects the entire FEHNCY project or a portion of it e.g., one specific research question.
Method(s): could provide additional details on the "realist evaluation approach" or why this approach was selected.
592
28
Billie Jane Hermosura
Poster
4
4
3
4
3
5
4
Introduction: The first sentence could be stronger. For impact, perhaps start with how the COVID-19 pandemic has disproportionately impacted FN peoples or how the pandemic further disadvantaged FN peoples. The first part is somewhat superfluous.
Method(s): Note the data collection period. This would be important to know taking into consideration the duration of the pandemic, different waves, etc. Clarification: see Conclusion > Was there one FN community or several FN communities included in this project?
Results: Clearly identify which sub-themes (specific findings) relate to community resilience and collaboration.
Conclusion: Refers to "one community" > did this study focus on one community's members or different communities? Needs alignment with Method(s).
Writing: avoid using contractions in academic writing; some punctuation marks missing. Recommend proofreading and revising for clarity and brevity (e.g., during COVID-19 rather than "in the context of").
Recommendations: Accept with revisions.
592
32
Christina Lengyel
Poster
4
5
4
5
5
5
4
Methods need more detail. Great abstract!
590
28
Christina Lengyel
Poster
5
5
3
3
4
4
4
Good abstract! More details needed for methods and results.
590
33
Billie Jane Hermosura
Poster
4
5
4
5
5
5
4
Important exploratory research conducted. Clear and concise objectives; results; conclusions.
Introduction: Clear and concise. Would be interesting to have more current data (e.g., 2013 is somewhat old).
Method(s): How were the surveys analyzed? What type of information was being gathered (e.g., types of foods were listed or qualitative responses)?
549
32
Christina Lengyel
Poster
5
5
4
5
4
4
5
Nice abstract! More detail in methods section needed.
549
35
Billie Jane Hermosura
Poster
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
Abstract is well-written. The Introduction, Objective(s), and Method(s) were clear and concise. The Conclusions aligned with the Results presented. This research reflect current issues in EN.
542
24
Billie Jane Hermosura
Poster
4
3
3
4
3
4
3
Understanding what "food literate" means for different audiences is important for effective nutrition programming.
Introduction: Could be more concise to allow for other sections to be elaborated. Recommend revising for clarity and brevity.
Objective(s): Although the RD team recognized the lack of food literacy definition to inform practice, the objective of this project/study is unclear. Recommend clarifying what the objective of this work was and/or the research or guiding questions.
Method(s): Unclear (e.g., group/interviews > were these focus groups interview and/or individual interviews?). Briefly describe how the surveys and interviews were analyzed. When the team worked with external stakeholders, was this through "consultations" or something else > unclear what the working relationship was with these stakeholders.
Result(s): Are the four pathways part of the "framework"? Clarify the connection.
Conclusions: Are these next steps for DFC or broad recommendations? Perhaps by clarifying the objective(s) of this specific work, the conclusions would be clearer.
Overall: important work for dietetic practice; recommend accept with revisions.
542
33
Carla D'Andreamatteo
Poster
5
5
4
5
5
5
4
I would like to learn more/see more about the methodology that was used in the collaboration with various stakeholders to reach the final proposed food literacy definition that is suggested.

We Can’t Do This Without You.

Donate today or contact us.