Manage Abstracts
View, approve, edit, or delete Abstracts using the table below.
Entry ID
22
Entry Date
August 30, 2022 11:18 pm
Reference Id
Approve Entries
CFDR Reviewer
Document Status
Published
Click to Edit
Name
Email
Language
English
Year
2021
Category
Presentation Preference
Title
Addressing malnutrition through diet liberalization: comparing therapeutic diets prescribed by the multidisciplinary team on acute medicine
Names, Organizational Affiliations, and Locations of all Authors
Introduction/Purpose
There is increasing recognition that effective care of hospitalized patients requires a multidisciplinary approach, however gaps in nutrition care between Registered Dietitians (RDs) and non-dietitian health care providers (HCPs) exist. This may lead to patients receiving inappropriate therapeutic or nutritionally inadequate diets. Diet liberalization is one effective way to address the restrictive nature of therapeutic diets and combat malnutrition.
Objective(s)/Process or Summary of Content
To explore differences between admitting diet orders and those assessed by RDs. Specifically, whether or not diets were liberalized by RDs based on the presence of malnutrition, as categorized by Subjective Global Assessment (SGA), and how frequently HCPs and RDs order therapeutic diets.
Method(s)/Systemic Approach Used
A retrospective, randomized chart review of adult patients admitted to acute medicine at St. Paul’s Hospital between April 1, 2018 and March 31, 2019 was conducted between March and August 2020. The sample was deemed representative of the study population. Descriptive statistics were used to assess the frequency of diet liberalization and of each diet type being ordered. Chi-squared test and logistic regression were performed to investigate the relationship between malnutrition (SGA status) and diet liberalization.
Results/Conclusions
A total of 204 patient charts were included. Upon first nutrition assessment, RDs liberalized the diet order for 17% of patients and changed the admitting diet order for 59% of patients. Statistically significant differences between the types of therapeutic diets ordered by HCPs and RDs were found. There was no statistically significant difference between the degree of malnutrition (SGA status) and diet liberalization by RDs.
Conclusions(s)/Recommendations
Although RDs do not liberalize diets as often as hypothesized, results of this study demonstrate a discrepancy in the diets that HCPs and RDs frequently order, requiring RDs to modify over half of admitting diet orders.
Significance to Dietetics
The findings reveal that RDs frequently modify diets to meet individual nutritional needs. Early RD referral and ongoing multidisciplinary collaboration will lead to a more patientcentred approach to prevent and manage malnutrition.
Funded by
2019 Providence Health Care Research Challenge Grant
Original Work
Transfer of Copyright
Co-Authors Review and Notification
Newsletter
Delete Entry Link
