Manage Abstracts

View, approve, edit, or delete Abstracts using the table below.

Return to Abstracts List
Entry ID
84
Reference Id
gbisRj5J6DCvHVmF
Approve Entries
CFDR Reviewer
Document Status
Published
Click to Edit
Name
Email
Language
English
Year
2020
Category
Presentation Preference
Title
Assessing the sustained impact of the Robson Valley Lifestyle in Vanderhoof, BC: A retrospective chart review
Names, Organizational Affiliations, and Locations of all Authors
Introduction/Purpose
This research describes the sustained impacts of participation in the Robson Valley Lifestyle (RVL) which was a low-carb, low-fat diet program in Vanderhoof, BC
Objective(s)/Process or Summary of Content
This research describes the population that participated in the RVL and compared anthropometric and biochemical data of participants before, immediately after, and 3 to 4 years after participating in the RVL. Additionally, it identifies the number of participants who were seen by a dietitian.
Method(s)/Systemic Approach Used
A retrospective chart review was conducted on RVL participants from the Omineca Medical Clinic in Vanderhoof, BC. Data on various health parameters were collected pre-RVL, post-RVL, and at present. Two-tailed t-tests were conducted between each participants’ health data at each time interval. Dietitian involvement during and after the RVL was also tracked.
Results/Conclusions
38 participants met the inclusion criteria. For pre- vs post-RVL, significant differences (p-value <0.05, 95% CI) were found in BMI (-2.8 kg/m2; CI -3.8 to -1.8), weight (-8.8 kg; CI -10.7 to -7.0), and systolic blood pressure (-5mmHg; CI -9.1 to 0). Comparing post-RVL vs present, significant differences were found in BMI (+3.9kg/m2; CI 2.8 to 5.0), weight (+12.6kg; CI 9.5 to 15.8), systolic (+8mmHg; CI 0.6 to 15.3) and diastolic (+6mmHg; CI 1.5 to 9.5) blood pressure, and fasting glucose (+0.5mmol/L; CI 0.1 to 0.8). Comparing pre-RVL to present, weight (+3.8kg; CI 0.8 to 6.7) and diastolic blood pressure (+5mmHg; CI 0.3 to 8.2) were significantly higher. 0% of participants were referred to a dietitian during the program, and 16% were referred to after.
Conclusions(s)/Recommendations
The initial impact of the RVL has not been sustained.
Significance to Dietetics
This research adds to the body of literature that suggests benefits from restrictive diets are not sustained
Funded by
Original Work
Transfer of Copyright
Co-Authors Review and Notification
Newsletter
Delete Entry Link

We Can’t Do This Without You.

Donate today or contact us.